The Rise of the Leverage Architect
- Evan Waters
- 3 days ago
- 4 min read
The next 5 years belongs to operators who understand the mechanics—and know how to build systems that compound
Over the last fifteen years, marketing has shifted from a craft defined by instinct to a discipline defined by systems.
Automation, AI, and platform-level optimization have replaced much of the manual execution that used to differentiate great operators from average ones.
But something profound and nuanced is happening around the marketing and growth arenas.
As the technology layer becomes more automated, the value of people who understand the mechanics underneath is dramatically increasing, not decreasing like the entry level marketing jobs around them.
There’s a specific archetype this moment rewards and it isn't the growth hackers of the 2010s, nor the AI prompt jockeys of 2024.
Call them the Leverage Architect.
A Leverage Architect is someone who knows the fundamentals deeply enough to design systems that compound—someone who pairs pre-AI intuition with post-AI automation to scale their judgment across an entire stack.
And at least for the next five years, their value is going to rise faster than almost any other operator in the org.
Why Fundamentals Matter More in an Automated Era
Tools abstract complexity. But abstraction comes with a cost: fewer operators understand what the machine is actually doing.
Before automated bidding, dynamic creative generation, and endless LLM wrappers, marketers learned by working under hard constraints:
row limits in Excel
manual audience refreshes
brittle tracking setups
optimization by hand
stitching together datasets manually
debugging conversion pixels live, in production
Those constraints created a generation of operators with something rare in today’s environment: an intuition for how systems break and how to bend them without snapping.
The platforms today take away much of the manual work. And with it, they take away the ability to see the physics under the hood.
That’s where the Leverage Architect thrives. They understand:
Incrementality — not just whether something works, but whether it works because of you.
Saturation — when a channel’s marginal returns collapse, no matter how good the creative is.
Creative decay — as attention fatigues, how to extend winners over the long run
Model blind spots — where automated systems overfit, hallucinate, or misread intent.
Signal distortion — when automation is amplifying noise rather than signal
Why Companies Need Leverage Architects (and Usually a Pair)
Modern marketing is no longer a silo--it’s a network of interdependent systems: product, data, engineering, creative, finance.
Every high-performing marketing org today quietly relies on a two-player game:
A Fundamentals Marketer who understands the mechanics deeply
A Marketing Product Technologist who can operationalize those mechanics at scale
Otherwise stated, a Fundamentals Marketer knows what to do. A Marketing Product Technologist knows how to do it repeatedly at scale. This pairing is increasingly non-negotiable.
The Leverage Architect is the function—sometimes embodied in one person, often embodied in a partnership.
They translate:
intuition → systems
unit economics → automations
insight → repeatable workflows
scrappiness → structured loops
Without this translation layer, companies end up with one of three failure modes:
1. Scrappy but unscalable -- Great instincts, but forever stuck in manual mode.
2. Technical but misaligned -- Impressive automations, none of which deliver impact.
3. Automated but wrong -- Garbage-in, garbage-out at organizational scale.
Leverage Architects prevent all three by designing systems that encode judgment and scale.
The Leverage Triangle: Fundamentals × Automation × Scrappiness
If you map modern marketing talent, three traits deeply matter:
Fundamentals – understanding the economics, levers, and physics
Automation – knowing how data moves and systtems scale
Scrappiness – creativity to find leverage before tooling exists
The intersection of all three is rare. And that rarity is exactly why this moment is becoming a golden age for those who occupy it.
Instead, organizations are left focusing on one or maybe two of these traits. Without all three, teams are left with:
Scrappy + Fundamentals: strong early traction, stalls at scale.
Fundamentals + Automation: strong systems, often mis-size projects or fail to cut through organizational inertia.
Scrappy + Automation: fast output, but building on shaky assumptions ships complexity and amplify noise.
Only the combination of all three produces compounding output. Operators who started in the pre-automation era, matured under the 'big data' era, and adapted into the AI era have an asymmetric advantage.
Why This Moment Creates a Talent Bottleneck
Three macro forces:
Channels and data are more complex than ever.
AI accelerates execution—only for people who know what “good” looks like.
The tooling abstracts away the mechanics—making fundamentals harder to acquire.
Put differently, we have more power, while fewer people who know how to steer it.
Leverage Architects are the steering wheel.
They don’t just execute, they design leverage. They build the systems that scale, know what to automate, what to ignore, and what to sweat.
This is a moment where companies are rediscovering something old: leverage is not created by tools alone. It is created by operators who understand where those tools actually work.
And those operators are scarce.
The Call to Arms
If you learned marketing before AI, your skill is more valuable—if you learn to express it through systems.
If you’re a technical PM, the highest-leverage partner you can find is someone who understands acquisition and retention physics and can translate them into architecture.
And if you’re leading a growth or marketing team, the most important hire you can make in the next three years is a Leverage Architect—someone who can design systems that compound and ensure the machines amplify judgment, not mistakes.
This is the golden age not of automation, but of fundamenentals leverage.
And the people who can architect it—those who can translate foundational strength into compounding systems—are on their ascent of the talent heap.

















Comments